A Legal Showdown Looms: Martin Kpebu Faces OSP Over Explosive Allegations Against Kissi Agyebeng
In a development that has sent shockwaves through Ghana’s legal and political circles, prominent private legal practitioner Martin Kpebu is set to face questioning by the Office of the Special Prosecutor (OSP). But here’s where it gets controversial: Kpebu’s summons stems from his recent, scathing comments about the conduct of Special Prosecutor Kissi Agyebeng in the ongoing corruption investigations involving former Finance Minister Ken Ofori-Atta. Could this be a turning point in the accountability of those tasked with fighting corruption? Or is it a strategic move to silence a vocal critic? Let’s dive in.
During an interview with GhanaWeb on Tuesday, November 18, 2025, Kpebu confirmed the OSP’s invitation, revealing it was directly tied to his public statements about Agyebeng’s handling of the Ofori-Atta case. Kpebu is scheduled to appear before the OSP on Wednesday, November 19, 2025, to clarify his remarks. But this isn’t just a routine clarification—Kpebu sees it as an opportunity to double down on his stance. “They want me to explain my comments, and I’ll do just that,” he stated, adding, “This is my chance to reiterate why Agyebeng and certain OSP officials should step down immediately.”
Kpebu’s core argument is bold and unapologetic: Agyebeng’s recent interview, where he admitted to being powerless to prevent Ofori-Atta’s departure from Ghana, reveals a failure to act in the nation’s best interest. “It’s clear as day—they’re either working for the people of Ghana or they’re not. This double agency cannot continue,” Kpebu asserted. He went further, alleging collusion between Agyebeng and Ofori-Atta, a claim that has sparked intense debate. “He said he intercepted the letter, yet he allowed Ofori-Atta to leave. How does that make sense?” Kpebu questioned.
In a previous interview on TV3’s The KeyPoints on November 8, 2025, Kpebu had accused Agyebeng of complicity in Ofori-Atta’s exit, arguing that the Special Prosecutor should have informed the Ghanaian public about the challenges he faced. “Kissi doesn’t seem to understand that sovereignty lies with the people of Ghana. If he couldn’t stop Ofori-Atta, he should have turned to the public for support,” Kpebu explained. He also highlighted Agyebeng’s admission of seeking help from the Immigration Service and NIB, only to be met with inaction. “The solution was right there—transparency. But he chose silence instead,” Kpebu added.
And this is the part most people miss: Kpebu didn’t stop at Ofori-Atta’s case. He also alleged widespread corruption within the OSP under Agyebeng’s leadership, a claim that, if proven, could have far-reaching implications. “The game is over. They need to go,” Kpebu declared, leaving no room for ambiguity.
As Kpebu prepares to face the OSP, the stakes couldn’t be higher. Is this a legitimate inquiry into his statements, or an attempt to silence a critic? And what does this mean for the future of anti-corruption efforts in Ghana? One thing is certain: this confrontation will be closely watched, and the outcome could reshape public trust in the OSP. But here’s the question we leave you with: Do you think Kpebu’s allegations hold water, or is he overstepping his bounds? Let us know in the comments—this is a conversation Ghana needs to have.
